According to Gaudi-vayshnavskomu theology, the divine female energy (Shakti) comes from the divine source, God, or shaktimana. "Sister Sita Ram, Lakshmi owns Narayane, while Radhi has its Krishna". Since Krishna is considered as the source of all manifestations of God, "Radhi, his wife, was the original source of all Shakti" or female emanation of divine energy.

   Medieval Gaudi-vayshnavsky theologian Dzhiva Goswami in his work "Preeti-sandarbha" argues that each gopi has a different level of ecstatic love. The highest level of love for the Krishna demonstrates Radhi.

   Common origins of words and Shakti shaktiman, in this case referring to male and female hypostasis of God, points to the fact that they neotlichny from each other and there is one. Almost all forms of God in Hinduism, as well as all the virgins are female partner, a "better half" or Shakti. Without this Shakti, they are often regarded as not having power. In Hinduism is the usual practice of worshiping God in both its female and male hypostasis, that is the case with Radhi-Krishna. Traditions, which worships Krishna as svayam-bhagavanu in his male form, also include the worship of the female half Radhi, also venerated as the supreme deity. It is believed to generally provide, in which the unity of Radhi and Krishna could mean union with Shakti shaktimanom, with this point of view, there is also outside the orthodox vayshnavizma and krishnaizma.

   The concept of Shakti-shaktimana known as Shakti-parinama-Wade, or modifying the teachings of divine energy, one can find the ontological structure that describes the "in-a-and-for-itself" God.

   Krishna - Shaktiman, "with Shakti" (force or energy). Shakti is at the same time and the ability to Krishna, while remaining unchanged, transform themselves into different forms of life available, and the cash itself. In contrast to the avatar, which in all their diversity are nothing like Krishna himself, as if placed on a different guise, Shakti is the essence of a different order, with its base in the Krishna, are inextricably related, but distinct from it and about independent. As an analogy, gives the ratio of sun and its rays, which emanate from the sun, depend on it, but there is something different from the body. Despite the fact that the sun emits enormous energy, it is always equal to himself. Likewise, Krishna is always full and does not tolerate any harm, despite the fact that transformed itself through its many forms of Shakti. Followers Shankar did not recognize the teachings of Shakti-parinama-vady because they believe if you allow modifications will inevitably need to recognize that Brahman suffers damage, but then he did not have a single (advaya), which is impossible. Consequently, any change is an illusion. On the other hand, this view denies the followers of Advaita opportunity to explain the origin of the diversity of existing life, and the interpretation of such Shankar at odds with authoritative testimony Upanishad, one of the famous sayings that the doctrine of Shakti-parinama-vady that has been affirmed: "when subtracted from a integer, the original integer is a whole".